SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2305.08691

SEAL: A Strategy-Proof and Privacy-Preserving UAV Computation Offloading Framework

Abstract

Due to the limited battery and computing resource, offloading unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)' computation tasks to ground infrastructure, e.g., vehicles, is a fundamental framework. Under such an open and untrusted environment, vehicles are reluctant to share their computing resource unless provisioning strong incentives, privacy protection, and fairness guarantee. Precisely, without strategy-proofness guarantee, the strategic vehicles can overclaim participation costs so as to conduct market manipulation. Without the fairness provision, vehicles can deliberately abort the assigned tasks without any punishments, and UAVs can refuse to pay by the end, causing an exchange dilemma. Lastly, the strategy-proofness and fairness provision typically require transparent payment/task results exchange under public audit, which may disclose sensitive information of vehicles and make the privacy preservation a foremost issue. To achieve the three design goals, we propose SEAL, an integrated framework to address strategy-proof, fair, and privacy-preserving UAV computation offloading. SEAL deploys a strategy-proof reverse combinatorial auction mechanism to optimize UAVs' task offloading under practical constraints while ensuring economic-robustness and polynomial-time efficiency. Based on smart contracts and hashchain micropayment, SEAL implements a fair on-chain exchange protocol to realize the atomic completion of batch payments and computing results in multi-round auctions. In addition, a privacy-preserving off-chain auction protocol is devised with the assistance of the trusted processor to efficiently protect vehicles' bid privacy. Using rigorous theoretical analysis and extensive simulations, we validate that SEAL can effectively prevent vehicles from manipulating, ensure privacy protection and fairness, improve the offloading efficiency.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yuntao Wang, Zhou Su, Tom H. Luan, Jiliang Li, Qichao Xu, Ruidong Li. 2023-05-15. SEAL: A Strategy-Proof and Privacy-Preserving UAV Computation Offloading Framework. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08691

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT