arXiv · 2305.12601
Simply typed convertibility is TOWER-complete even for safe lambda-terms
Abstract
We consider the following decision problem: given two simply typed $\lambda$-terms, are they $\beta$-convertible? Equivalently, do they have the same normal form? It is famously non-elementary, but the precise complexity - namely TOWER-complete - is lesser known. One goal of this short paper is to popularize this fact. Our original contribution is to show that the problem stays TOWER-complete when the two input terms belong to Blum and Ong's safe $\lambda$-calculus, a fragment of the simply typed $\lambda$-calculus arising from the study of higher-order recursion schemes. Previously, the best known lower bound for this safe $\beta$-convertibility problem was PSPACE-hardness. Our proof proceeds by reduction from the star-free expression equivalence problem, taking inspiration from the author's work with Pradic on "implicit automata in typed $\lambda$-calculi". These results also hold for $\beta\eta$-convertibility.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Lê Thành Dũng Nguyên. 2023-05-21. Simply typed convertibility is TOWER-complete even for safe lambda-terms. https://doi.org/10.46298/lmcs-20(3%3A21)2024
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.