SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2305.17615

Estimating overidentified linear models with heteroskedasticity and outliers

Abstract

A large degree of overidentification causes severe bias in TSLS. A conventional heuristic rule used to motivate new estimators in this context is approximate bias. This paper formalizes the definition of approximate bias and expands the applicability of approximate bias to various classes of estimators that bridge OLS, TSLS, and Jackknife IV estimators (JIVEs). By evaluating their approximate biases, I propose new approximately unbiased estimators, including UOJIVE1 and UOJIVE2. UOJIVE1 can be interpreted as a generalization of an existing estimator UIJIVE1. Both UOJIVEs are proven to be consistent and asymptotically normal under a fixed number of instruments and controls. The asymptotic proofs for UOJIVE1 in this paper require the absence of high leverage points, whereas proofs for UOJIVE2 do not. In addition, UOJIVE2 is consistent under many-instrument asymptotic. The simulation results align with the theorems in this paper: (i) Both UOJIVEs perform well under many instrument scenarios with or without heteroskedasticity, (ii) When a high leverage point coincides with a high variance of the error term, an outlier is generated and the performance of UOJIVE1 is much poorer than that of UOJIVE2.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Lei Bill Wang. 2023-05-28. Estimating overidentified linear models with heteroskedasticity and outliers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.17615

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM