Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2305.18705

Algorithmic Foundations of Inexact Computing

John Augustine·Dror Fried·Krishna V. Palem·Duc-Hung Pham·Anshumali Shrivastava
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Inexact computing also referred to as approximate computing is a style of designing algorithms and computing systems wherein the accuracy of correctness of algorithms executing on them is deliberately traded for significant resource savings. Significant progress has been reported in this regard both in terms of hardware as well as software or custom algorithms that exploited this approach resulting in some loss in solution quality (accuracy) while garnering disproportionately high savings. However, these approaches tended to be ad-hoc and were tied to specific algorithms and technologies. Consequently, a principled approach to designing and analyzing algorithms was lacking. In this paper, we provide a novel model which allows us to characterize the behavior of algorithms designed to be inexact, as well as characterize opportunities and benefits that this approach offers. Our methods therefore are amenable to standard asymptotic analysis and provides a clean unified abstraction through which an algorithm's design and analysis can be conducted. With this as a backdrop, we show that inexactness can be significantly beneficial for some fundamental problems in that the quality of a solution can be exponentially better if one exploits inexactness when compared to approaches that are agnostic and are unable to exploit this approach. We show that such gains are possible in the context of evaluating Boolean functions rooted in the theory of Boolean functions and their spectra, PAC learning, and sorting. Formally, this is accomplished by introducing the twin concepts of inexactness aware and inexactness oblivious approaches to designing algorithms and the exponential gains are shown in the context of taking the ratio of the quality of the solution using the "aware" approach to the "oblivious" approach.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

John Augustine, Dror Fried, Krishna V. Palem, Duc-Hung Pham, Anshumali Shrivastava. 2023-05-30. Algorithmic Foundations of Inexact Computing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18705

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗