Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2306.01301

Nonholonomic Motion Planning as Efficient as Piano Mover's

David Nister·Jaikrishna Soundararajan·Yizhou Wang·Harshad Sane
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present an algorithm for non-holonomic motion planning (or 'parking a car') that is as computationally efficient as a simple approach to solving the famous Piano-mover's problem, where the non-holonomic constraints are ignored. The core of the approach is a graph-discretization of the problem. The graph-discretization is provably accurate in modeling the non-holonomic constraints, and yet is nearly as small as the straightforward regular grid discretization of the Piano-mover's problem into a 3D volume of 2D position plus angular orientation. Where the Piano mover's graph has one vertex and edges to six neighbors each, we have three vertices with a total of ten edges, increasing the graph size by less than a factor of two, and this factor does not depend on spatial or angular resolution. The local edge connections are organized so that they represent globally consistent turn and straight segments. The graph can be used with Dijkstra's algorithm, A*, value iteration or any other graph algorithm. Furthermore, the graph has a structure that lends itself to processing with deterministic massive parallelism. The turn and straight curves divide the configuration space into many parallel groups. We use this to develop a customized 'kernel-style' graph processing method. It results in an N-turn planner that requires no heuristics or load balancing and is as efficient as a simple solution to the Piano mover's problem even in sequential form. In parallel form it is many times faster than the sequential processing of the graph, and can run many times a second on a consumer grade GPU while exploring a configuration space pose grid with very high spatial and angular resolution. We prove approximation quality and computational complexity and demonstrate that it is a flexible, practical, reliable, and efficient component for a production solution.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

David Nister, Jaikrishna Soundararajan, Yizhou Wang, Harshad Sane. 2023-06-02. Nonholonomic Motion Planning as Efficient as Piano Mover's. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.01301

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗