SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2306.02012

Analogues of Shepherdson's Theorem for a language with exponentiation

Abstract

In 1964 Shepherdson \cite{shepherdson:1964} proved that a discretely ordered semiring $\mathcal{M}^+$ satisfies $\sf{IOpen}$ (quantifier free induction) iff the corresponding ring $\mathcal{M}$ is an integer part of the real closure of the quotient field of $\mathcal{M}$. In this paper, we consider open induction schema in the language of arithmetic expanded by exponentiation or by the power function and try to find similar criteria for models of these theories. For several expansions $T$ of the theory of real closed fields we obtain analogues of Shepherdson's Theorem in the following sense: If an exponential field $\mathcal R$ is a model of $T$ and a discretely ordered ring $\mathcal M$ is an (exponential) integer part of $\mathcal R$, then $\mathcal M^+$ is a model of the open induction in the expanded language. The proof of the opposite implication, in general, remains an open question. However, we isolate a natural sufficient condition, related to the well-known Bernoulli inequality, under which this result holds. We define a finite extension $T$ of the usual open induction so that, for any discretely ordered ring $\mathcal M$, the semiring $\mathcal M^+$ satisfies $T$ iff there is an exponential real closed field $\mathcal R$ with the inequality $\exp(x) \geqslant 1 + x$ such that $\mathcal M$ is an exponential integer part of $\mathcal R$. Using these results, we obtain some concrete independence results for these theories.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Konstantin Kovalyov. 2023-06-03. Analogues of Shepherdson's Theorem for a language with exponentiation. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exag013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO