Comparing disorder and adaptability in stochasticity

Liling Ko; Justin Miller

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2306.02225

Comparing disorder and adaptability in stochasticity

Liling Ko·Justin Miller

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the literature, there are various notions of stochasticity which measure how well an algorithmically random set satisfies the law of large numbers. Such notions can be categorized by disorder and adaptability: adaptive strategies may use information observed about the set when deciding how to act, and disorderly strategies may act out of order. In the disorderly setting, adaptive strategies are more powerful than non-adaptive ones. In the adaptive setting, Merkle et al. showed that disorderly strategies are more powerful than orderly ones. This leaves open the question of how disorderly, non-adaptive strategies compare to orderly, adaptive strategies, as well as how both relate to orderly, non-adaptive strategies. In this paper, we show that orderly, adaptive strategies and disorderly, non-adaptive strategies are both strictly more powerful than orderly, non-adaptive strategies. Using the techniques developed to prove this, we also make progress towards the former open question by introducing a notion of orderly, ``weakly adaptable'' strategies which we prove is incomparable with disorderly, non-adaptive strategies.

Explore related subjects

math.LO math.PR

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Liling Ko, Justin Miller. 2023-06-04. Comparing disorder and adaptability in stochasticity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02225

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗

arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗

arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗