SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2306.03768

$U$-topology and $m$-topology on the ring of Measurable Functions, generalized and revisited

Abstract

Let $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$ be the ring of all real valued measurable functions defined over the measurable space $(X,\mathcal{A})$. Given an ideal $I$ in $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$ and a measure $\mu:\mathcal{A}\to[0,\infty]$, we introduce the $U_\mu^I$-topology and the $m_\mu^I$-topology on $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$ as generalized versions of the topology of uniform convergence or the $U$-topology and the $m$-topology on $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$ respectively. With $I=\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$, these two topologies reduce to the $U_\mu$-topology and the $m_\mu$-topology on $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$ respectively, already considered before. If $I$ is a countably generated ideal in $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$, then the $U_\mu^I$-topology and the $m_\mu^I$-topology coincide if and only if $X\setminus \bigcap Z[I]$ is a $\mu$-bounded subset of $X$. The components of $0$ in $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$ in the $U_\mu^I$-topology and the $m_\mu^I$-topology are realized as $I\cap L^\infty(X,\mathcal{A},\mu)$ and $I\cap L_\psi(X,\mathcal{A},\mu)$ respectively. Here $L^\infty(X,\mathcal{A},\mu)$ is the set of all functions in $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$ which are essentially $\mu$-bounded over $X$ and $L_\psi(X,\mathcal{A},\mu)=\{f\in \mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}): ~\forall g\in\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A}), f.g\in L^\infty(X,\mathcal{A},\mu)\}$. It is established that an ideal $I$ in $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$ is dense in the $U_\mu$-topology if and only if it is dense in the $m_\mu$-topology and this happens when and only when there exists $Z\in Z[I]$ such that $\mu(Z)=0$. Furthermore, it is proved that $I$ is closed in $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$ in the $m_\mu$-topology if and only if it is a $Z_\mu$-ideal in the sense that if $f\equiv g$ almost everywhere on $X$ with $f\in I$ and $g\in\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$, then $g\in I$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Pratip Nandi, Atasi Deb Ray, Sudip Kumar Acharyya. 2023-06-03. $U$-topology and $m$-topology on the ring of Measurable Functions, generalized and revisited. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03768

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN