Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2306.05243

Analysis of Knuth's Sampling Algorithm D and D'

Mridul Nandi·Soumit Paul
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this research paper, we address the Distinct Elements estimation problem in the context of streaming algorithms. The problem involves estimating the number of distinct elements in a given data stream $\mathcal{A} = (a_1, a_2,\ldots, a_m)$, where $a_i \in \{1, 2, \ldots, n\}$. Over the past four decades, the Distinct Elements problem has received considerable attention, theoretically and empirically, leading to the development of space-optimal algorithms. A recent sampling-based algorithm proposed by Chakraborty et al.[11] has garnered significant interest and has even attracted the attention of renowned computer scientist Donald E. Knuth, who wrote an article on the same topic [6] and called the algorithm CVM. In this paper, we thoroughly examine the algorithms (referred to as CVM1, CVM2 in [11] and DonD, DonD' in [6]. We first unify all these algorithms and call them cutoff-based algorithms. Then we provide an approximation and biasedness analysis of these algorithms.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mridul Nandi, Soumit Paul. 2023-06-08. Analysis of Knuth's Sampling Algorithm D and D'. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.05243

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗