SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2306.16370

Reversible and Irreversible Trees

Abstract

A tree ${\mathbb T} =\langle T\leq \rangle$ is reversible iff there is no order $\preccurlyeq \;\varsubsetneq \;\leq $ such that ${\mathbb T} \cong \langle T ,\preccurlyeq\rangle$. Using a characterization of reversibility via back and forth systems we detect a wide class of non-reversible trees: ``bad trees" (having all branches of height ${\mathrm{ht}} ({\mathbb T})=|T|=|L_0|$, where $|T|$ is a regular cardinal). Consequently, a countable tree of height $\omega$ and without maximal elements is reversible iff all its nodes are finite. We show that a tree ${\mathbb T}$ is non-reversible iff it contains a ``critical node" or an ``archetypical subtree" (parts of ${\mathbb T}$ with some combinatorial properties). In particular, a tree with finite nodes ${\mathbb T}$ is reversible iff it does not contain archetypical subtrees. Using that characterization we prove that if for each ordinal $\alpha \in [\omega ,{\mathrm{ht}} ({\mathbb T}))$ all nodes of height $\alpha$ are of the same size, or the sequence $\langle \langle |N|,|N\uparrow|\rangle : {\mathcal{N}} ({\mathbb T}) \ni N\subset L_\alpha \rangle $ is finite-to-one, then ${\mathbb T}$ is reversible. Consequently, regular $n$-ary trees are reversible, reversible Aronszajn trees exist and, if there are Suslin or Kurepa trees, there are reversible ones. Also we show that for cardinals $\lambda >1$ and $\mu >0$ and ordinal $\alpha >0$ we have: the tree $\bigcup _\mu {}^{<\alpha }\lambda$ is reversible iff $\min\{\alpha ,\lambda\mu\} <\omega$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Miloš S. Kurilić. 2023-06-28. Reversible and Irreversible Trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16370

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO