SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2307.06776

Approximation algorithms for the square min-sum bin packing problem

Abstract

In this work, we study the Square Min-Sum Bin Packing Problem (SMSBPP), where a list of $n$ square items has to be packed into square bins of dimensions $1 \times 1$ with no overlap between the areas of the items. The bins are indexed (starting at one) and the cost of packing each item is equal to the index of the bin in which it is placed. The objective is to minimize the total cost of packing all items, which is equivalent to minimizing the average cost of items. The problem has applications in minimizing the average time of logistic operations such as cutting stock and delivery of products. We prove that classic algorithms for two-dimensional bin packing that order items in non-increasing order of size, such as Next Fit Decreasing Height or Any Fit Decreasing Height heuristics, can have an arbitrarily bad performance for SMSBPP. We, then, present an algorithm with an approximation ratio of $\sqrt{205}-12+\delta$ ($\approx 2.3178+\delta$), for any $\delta > 0$, and running time $O(n \log n)$. Finally, we also present a PTAS for the problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Rachel Vanucchi Saraiva, Rafael C. S. Schouery. 2023-07-13. Approximation algorithms for the square min-sum bin packing problem. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-026-01425-4.

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS