WSRPT is 1.2259-competitive for Weighted Completion Time Scheduling

Samin Jamalabadi; Uwe Schwiegelshohn

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2307.07739

WSRPT is 1.2259-competitive for Weighted Completion Time Scheduling

Samin Jamalabadi·Uwe Schwiegelshohn

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

\textit{Weighted shortest processing time first} (WSPT) is one of the best known algorithms for total weighted completion time scheduling problems. For each job $J_j$, it first combines the two independent job parameters weight $w_j$ and processing time $p_j$ by simply forming the so called Smith ratio $w_j/p_j$. Then it schedules the jobs in order of decreasing Smith ratio values. The algorithm guarantees an optimal schedule for a single machine and the approximation factor $1.2071$ for parallel identical machines. For the corresponding online problem in a single machine environment with preemption, the \textit{weighted shortest remaining processing time first} (WSRPT) algorithm replaces the processing time $p_j$ with the remaining processing time $p_j(t)$ for every job that is only partially executed at time $t$ when determining the Smith ratio. Since more than 10 years, we only know that the competitive ratio of this algorithm is in the interval $[1.2157,2]$. In this paper, we present the tight competitive ratio $1.2259$ for WSRPT. To this end, we iteratively reduce the instance space of the problem without affecting the worst case performance until we are able to analyze the remaining instances. This result makes WSRPT the best known algorithm for deterministic online total weighted completion time scheduling in a preemptive single machine environment improving the previous competitive ratio of $1.5651$. Additionally, we increase the lower bound of this competitive ratio from $1.0730$ to $1.1038$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Samin Jamalabadi, Uwe Schwiegelshohn. 2023-07-15. WSRPT is 1.2259-competitive for Weighted Completion Time Scheduling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07739

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗