On the Tractability of Defensive Alliance Problem

Sangam Balchandar Reddy; Anjeneya Swami Kare

doi:10.1016/j.dam.2025.09.008

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2307.09760

On the Tractability of Defensive Alliance Problem

Sangam Balchandar Reddy·Anjeneya Swami Kare

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Given a graph $G = (V, E)$, a non-empty set $S \subseteq V$ is a defensive alliance, if for every vertex $v \in S$, the majority of its closed neighbours are in $S$, that is, $|N_G[v] \cap S| \geq |N_G[v] \setminus S|$. The decision version of the problem is known to be NP-Complete even when restricted to split and bipartite graphs. The problem is \textit{fixed-parameter tractable} for the parameters solution size, vertex cover number and neighbourhood diversity. For the parameters treewidth and feedback vertex set number, the problem is W[1]-hard. \\ \hspace*{2em} In this paper, we study the defensive alliance problem for graphs with bounded degree. We show that the problem is \textit{polynomial-time solvable} on graphs with maximum degree at most 5 and NP-Complete on graphs with maximum degree 6. This rules out the fixed-parameter tractability of the problem for the parameter maximum degree of the graph. We also consider the problem from the standpoint of parameterized complexity. We provide an FPT algorithm using the Integer Linear Programming approach for the parameter distance to clique. We also answer an open question posed in \cite{AG2} by providing an FPT algorithm for the parameter twin cover.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Sangam Balchandar Reddy, Anjeneya Swami Kare. 2023-07-19. On the Tractability of Defensive Alliance Problem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2025.09.008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗