SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2307.11585

Subset Sampling and Its Extensions

Abstract

This paper studies the \emph{subset sampling} problem. The input is a set $\mathcal{S}$ of $n$ records together with a function $\textbf{p}$ that assigns each record $v\in\mathcal{S}$ a probability $\textbf{p}(v)$. A query returns a random subset $X$ of $\mathcal{S}$, where each record $v\in\mathcal{S}$ is sampled into $X$ independently with probability $\textbf{p}(v)$. The goal is to store $\mathcal{S}$ in a data structure to answer queries efficiently. If $\mathcal{S}$ fits in memory, the problem is interesting when $\mathcal{S}$ is dynamic. We develop a dynamic data structure with $\mathcal{O}(1+\mu_{\mathcal{S}})$ expected \emph{query} time, $\mathcal{O}(n)$ space and $\mathcal{O}(1)$ amortized expected \emph{update}, \emph{insert} and \emph{delete} time, where $\mu_{\mathcal{S}}=\sum_{v\in\mathcal{S}}\textbf{p}(v)$. The query time and space are optimal. If $\mathcal{S}$ does not fit in memory, the problem is difficult even if $\mathcal{S}$ is static. Under this scenario, we present an I/O-efficient algorithm that answers a \emph{query} in $\mathcal{O}\left((\log^*_B n)/B+(\mu_\mathcal{S}/B)\log_{M/B} (n/B)\right)$ amortized expected I/Os using $\mathcal{O}(n/B)$ space, where $M$ is the memory size, $B$ is the block size and $\log^*_B n$ is the number of iterative $\log_2(.)$ operations we need to perform on $n$ before going below $B$. In addition, when each record is associated with a real-valued key, we extend the \emph{subset sampling} problem to the \emph{range subset sampling} problem, in which we require that the keys of the sampled records fall within a specified input range $[a,b]$. For this extension, we provide a solution under the dynamic setting, with $\mathcal{O}(\log n+\mu_{\mathcal{S}\cap[a,b]})$ expected \emph{query} time, $\mathcal{O}(n)$ space and $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ amortized expected \emph{update}, \emph{insert} and \emph{delete} time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jinchao Huang, Sibo Wang. 2023-07-21. Subset Sampling and Its Extensions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.11585

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS