Bayesian Rationality in Satisfaction Games

Langford White; Oskar Rynkiewicz; Duong Nguyen; Hung Nguyen

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2307.13247

Bayesian Rationality in Satisfaction Games

Langford White·Oskar Rynkiewicz·Duong Nguyen·Hung Nguyen

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We introduce a new paradigm for game theory -- Bayesian satisfaction. This novel approach is a synthesis of the idea of Bayesian rationality introduced by Aumann, and satisfaction games. The concept of Bayesian rationality for which, in part, Robert Aumann was awarded the Nobel Prize in 2005, is concerned with players in a game acting in their own best interest given a subjective knowledge of the other players' behaviours as represented by a probability distribution. Satisfaction games have emerged in the engineering literature as a way of modelling competitive interactions in resource allocation problems where players seek to attain a specified level of utility, rather than trying to maximise utility. In this paper, we explore the relationship between optimality in Aumann's sense (correlated equilibria), and satisfaction in games. We show that correlated equilibria in a satisfaction game represent stable outcomes in which no player can increase their probability of satisfaction by unilateral deviation from the specified behaviour. Thus, we propose a whole new class of equilibrium outcomes in satisfaction games which include existing notions of equilibria in such games. Iterative algorithms for computing such equilibria based on the existing ideas of regret matching are presented and interpreted within the satisfaction framework. Numerical examples of resource allocation are presented to illustrate the behaviour of these algorithms. A notable feature of these algorithms is that they almost always find equilibrium outcomes whereas existing approaches in satisfaction games may not.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Langford White, Oskar Rynkiewicz, Duong Nguyen, Hung Nguyen. 2023-07-25. Bayesian Rationality in Satisfaction Games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13247

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗