Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2307.14528

Function Value Learning: Adaptive Learning Rates Based on the Polyak Stepsize and Function Splitting in ERM

Guillaume Garrigos·Robert M. Gower·Fabian Schaipp
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Here we develop variants of SGD (stochastic gradient descent) with an adaptive step size that make use of the sampled loss values. In particular, we focus on solving a finite sum-of-terms problem, also known as empirical risk minimization. We first detail an idealized adaptive method called $\texttt{SPS}_+$ that makes use of the sampled loss values and assumes knowledge of the sampled loss at optimality. This $\texttt{SPS}_+$ is a minor modification of the SPS (Stochastic Polyak Stepsize) method, where the step size is enforced to be positive. We then show that $\texttt{SPS}_+$ achieves the best known rates of convergence for SGD in the Lipschitz non-smooth. We then move onto to develop $\texttt{FUVAL}$, a variant of $\texttt{SPS}_+$ where the loss values at optimality are gradually learned, as opposed to being given. We give three viewpoints of $\texttt{FUVAL}$, as a projection based method, as a variant of the prox-linear method, and then as a particular online SGD method. We then present a convergence analysis of $\texttt{FUVAL}$ and experimental results. The shortcomings of our work is that the convergence analysis of $\texttt{FUVAL}$ shows no advantage over SGD. Another shortcomming is that currently only the full batch version of $\texttt{FUVAL}$ shows a minor advantages of GD (Gradient Descent) in terms of sensitivity to the step size. The stochastic version shows no clear advantage over SGD. We conjecture that large mini-batches are required to make $\texttt{FUVAL}$ competitive. Currently the new $\texttt{FUVAL}$ method studied in this paper does not offer any clear theoretical or practical advantage. We have chosen to make this draft available online nonetheless because of some of the analysis techniques we use, such as the non-smooth analysis of $\texttt{SPS}_+$, and also to show an apparently interesting approach that currently does not work.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGmath.OC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Guillaume Garrigos, Robert M. Gower, Fabian Schaipp. 2023-07-26. Function Value Learning: Adaptive Learning Rates Based on the Polyak Stepsize and Function Splitting in ERM. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.14528

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗