Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2308.00202

Randomization Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects under Network Interference

Julius Owusu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We develop randomization-based tests for heterogeneous treatment effects in the presence of network interference. Leveraging the exposure mapping framework, we study a broad class of null hypotheses that represent various forms of constant treatment effects in networked populations. These null hypotheses, unlike the classical Fisher sharp null, are not sharp due to unknown parameters and multiple potential outcomes. Existing conditional randomization procedures either fail to control size or suffer from low statistical power in this setting. We propose a testing procedure that constructs a data-dependent focal assignment set and permits variation in focal units across focal assignments. These features complicate both estimation and inference, necessitating new technical developments. We establish the asymptotic validity of the proposed procedure under general conditions on the test statistic and characterize the asymptotic size distortion in terms of observable quantities. The procedure is applied to experimental network data and evaluated via Monte Carlo simulations.

Explore related subjects

econ.EM

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Julius Owusu. 2023-07-31. Randomization Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects under Network Interference. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.00202

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM↗