SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2308.01286

Enumeration Kernels of Polynomial Size for Cuts of Bounded Degree

Abstract

Enumeration kernelization was first proposed by Creignou et al. [TOCS 2017] and was later refined by Golovach et al. [JCSS 2022] into two different variants: fully-polynomial enumeration kernelization and polynomial-delay enumeration kernelization. In this paper, we consider the d-CUT problem from the perspective of (polynomial-delay) enumeration kenrelization. Given an undirected graph G = (V, E), a cut F = (A, B) is a d-cut of G if every $u \in A$ has at most d neighbors in B and every $v \in B$ has at most d neighbors in A. Checking the existence of a d-cut in a graph is a well-known NP-hard problem and is well-studied in parameterized complexity [Algorithmica 2021, IWOCA 2021]. This problem also generalizes a well-studied problem MATCHING CUT (set d = 1) that has been a central problem in the literature of polynomial-delay enumeration kernelization. In this paper, we study three different enumeration variants of this problem, ENUM d-CUT, ENUM MIN-d-CUT and ENUM MAX-d-CUT that intends to enumerate all the d-cuts, all the minimal d-cuts and all the maximal d-cuts respectively. We consider various structural parameters of the input, e.g. vertex cover number, neighborhood diversity, and clique partition number. When vertex cover number and neighborhood diversity are considered as parameters, we provide polynomial-delay enumeration kernelizations of polynomial size for ENUM d-CUT and ENUM MAX-d-CUT and fully-polynomial enumeration kernels of polynomial size for ENUM MIN-d-CUT. When clique partition number is considered as the parameter, we provide bijective enumeration kernels for each of these three problems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Christian Komusiewicz, Diptapriyo Majumdar. 2023-08-02. Enumeration Kernels of Polynomial Size for Cuts of Bounded Degree. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01286

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS