SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2308.02717

Fixed point theorems for topological contractions and the Hutchinson operator

Abstract

For a topological space $X$ a topological contraction on $X$ is a closed mapping $f:X\to X$ such that for every open cover of $X$ there is a positive integer $n$ such that the image of the space $X$ via the $n$th iteration of $f$ is a subset of some element of the cover. Every topological contraction in a compact $T_1$ space has a unique fixed point. As in the case of metric spaces and the classical Banach fixed point theorem, this analogue of Banach's theorem is true not only in compact but also in complete (here in the sense of \v{C}ech) $T_1$ spaces. We introduce a notion of weak topological contraction and in Hausdorff spaces we prove the existence of a unique fixed point for such continuous and closed mappings without assuming completeness or compactness of the space considered. These theorems are applied to prove existence of fixed points for mappings on compact subsets of linear spaces with weak topologies and for compact monoids. We also prove some fixed point results for $T_1$ locally Hausdorff spaces and, introduced here, peripherally Hausdorff spaces. An iterated function system on a topological space, IFS, is a finite family of closed mappings from the space into itself. It is contractive if for every open cover of $X$ for some positive integer $n$ the image of $X$ via a composition of $n$ mappings from the IFS is contained in an element of the cover. We show that in $T_1$ compact topological spaces the Hutchinson operator of a contractive IFS may not be closed as the mapping in the hyperspace of closed subsets of the space. Nevertheless, the Hutchinson operator of a contractive IFS has always a unique fixed point.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michał Morayne, Robert Rałowski. 2023-08-04. Fixed point theorems for topological contractions and the Hutchinson operator. https://doi.org/10.24033/bsmf.2914

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN