SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2308.07064

Axiomatic Theory of Independence Relations in Model Theory

Abstract

This course introduces the fruitful links between model theory and a combinatoric of sets given by independence relations. An independence relation on a set is a ternary relation between subsets. Chapter 1 should be considered as an introductory chapter. It does not mention first-order theories or formulas. It introduces independence relations in a naive set theory framework. Its goal is to get the reader familiar with basic axioms of independence relations (which do not need an ambient theory to be stated) as well as introduce closure operators and pregeometries. Chapter 2 introduces the model-theoretic context. The two main examples (algebraically closed fields and the random graph) are described as well as independence relations in those examples. Chapter 3 gives the axioms of independence relations in a model-theoretic context. It introduces the general toolbox of the model-theorists (indiscernible sequences, Ramsey/Erdos-Rado and compactness) and the independence relations of heirs/coheirs with two main applications: Adler's theorem of symmetry (how symmetry emerges from a weaker set of axioms, which is rooted in the work of Kim and Pillay) and a criterion for NSOP4 using stationary independence relations in the style of Conant. Independence relations satisfying Adler's theorem of symmetry are here called 'Adler independence relations' or AIR. Chapter 4 treats forking and dividing. It is proved that dividing independence is always stronger than any AIR (even though it is not an AIR in general) a connection between the independence theorem and forking independence, which holds in all generality and is based on Kim-Pillay's approach. Then, simplicity is defined and the interesting direction of the Kim-Pillay theorem (namely that the existence of an Adler independence relation satisfying the independence theorem yields simplicity) is deduced from earlier results.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Christian d'Elbée. 2023-08-14. Axiomatic Theory of Independence Relations in Model Theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.07064

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO