SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2308.08670

Improved Approximation Bounds for Minimum Weight Cycle in the CONGEST Model

Abstract

Minimum Weight Cycle (MWC) is the problem of finding a simple cycle of minimum weight in a graph $G=(V,E)$. This is a fundamental graph problem with classical sequential algorithms that run in $\tilde{O}(n^3)$ and $\tilde{O}(mn)$ time where $n=|V|$ and $m=|E|$. In recent years this problem has received significant attention in the context of fine-grained sequential complexity as well as in the design of faster sequential approximation algorithms, though not much is known in the distributed CONGEST model. We present sublinear-round approximation algorithms for computing MWC in directed graphs, and weighted graphs. Our algorithms use a variety of techniques in non-trivial ways, such as in our approximate directed unweighted MWC algorithm that efficiently computes BFS from all vertices restricted to certain implicitly computed neighborhoods in sublinear rounds, and in our weighted approximation algorithms that use unweighted MWC algorithms on scaled graphs combined with a fast and streamlined method for computing multiple source approximate SSSP. We present $\tilde{\Omega}(\sqrt{n})$ lower bounds for arbitrary constant factor approximation of MWC in directed graphs and undirected weighted graphs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Vignesh Manoharan, Vijaya Ramachandran. 2023-08-16. Improved Approximation Bounds for Minimum Weight Cycle in the CONGEST Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08670

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS