Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design for Constitutive Model Calibration

Abstract

Computational simulation is increasingly relied upon for high-consequence engineering decisions, and a foundational element to solid mechanics simulations, such as finite element analysis (FEA), is a credible constitutive or material model. Calibration of these complex models is an essential step; however, the selection, calibration and validation of material models is often a discrete, multi-stage process that is decoupled from material characterization activities, which means the data collected does not always align with the data that is needed. To address this issue, an integrated workflow for delivering an enhanced characterization and calibration procedure (Interlaced Characterization and Calibration (ICC)) is introduced. This framework leverages Bayesian optimal experimental design (BOED) to select the optimal load path for a cruciform specimen in order to collect the most informative data for model calibration. The critical first piece of algorithm development is to demonstrate the active experimental design for a fast model with simulated data. For this demonstration, a material point simulator that models a plane stress elastoplastic material subject to bi-axial loading was chosen. The ICC framework is demonstrated on two exemplar problems in which BOED is used to determine which load step to take, e.g., in which direction to increment the strain, at each iteration of the characterization and calibration cycle. Calibration results from data obtained by adaptively selecting the load path within the ICC algorithm are compared to results from data generated under two naive static load paths that were chosen a priori based on human intuition. In these exemplar problems, data generated in an adaptive setting resulted in calibrated model parameters with reduced measures of uncertainty compared to the static settings.