SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2308.11018

Computational Synthesis of Wearable Robot Mechanisms: Application to Hip-Joint Mechanisms

Abstract

Since wearable linkage mechanisms could control the moment transmission from actuator(s) to wearers, they can help ensure that even low-cost wearable systems provide advanced functionality tailored to users' needs. For example, if a hip mechanism transforms an input torque into a spatially-varying moment, a wearer can get effective assistance both in the sagittal and frontal planes during walking, even with an affordable single-actuator system. However, due to the combinatorial nature of the linkage mechanism design space, the topologies of such nonlinear-moment-generating mechanisms are challenging to determine, even with significant computational resources and numerical data. Furthermore, on-premise production development and interactive design are nearly impossible in conventional synthesis approaches. Here, we propose an innovative autonomous computational approach for synthesizing such wearable robot mechanisms, eliminating the need for exhaustive searches or numerous data sets. Our method transforms the synthesis problem into a gradient-based optimization problem with sophisticated objective and constraint functions while ensuring the desired degree of freedom, range of motion, and force transmission characteristics. To generate arbitrary mechanism topologies and dimensions, we employed a unified ground model. By applying the proposed method for the design of hip joint mechanisms, the topologies and dimensions of non-series-type hip joint mechanisms were obtained. Biomechanical simulations validated its multi-moment assistance capability, and its wearability was verified via prototype fabrication. The proposed design strategy can open a new way to design various wearable robot mechanisms, such as shoulders, knees, and ankles.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Seok Won Kang, Jegyeong Ryu, Suh In Kim, Youngsoo Kim, Yoon Young Kim. 2023-08-21. Computational Synthesis of Wearable Robot Mechanisms: Application to Hip-Joint Mechanisms. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11018

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO