Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2308.11420

Supply Function Equilibrium in Networked Electricity Markets

YuanzhangXiao·ChaithanyaBandi·Ermin Wei
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study deregulated power markets with strategic power suppliers. In deregulated markets, each supplier submits its supply function (i.e., the amount of electricity it is willing to produce at various prices) to the independent system operator (ISO), who based on the submitted supply functions, dispatches the suppliers to clear the market with minimal total generation cost. If all suppliers reported their true marginal cost functions as supply functions, the market outcome would be efficient (i.e., the total generation cost is minimized). However, when suppliers are strategic and aim to maximize their own profits, the reported supply functions are not necessarily the true marginal cost functions, and the resulting market outcome may be inefficient. The efficiency loss depends crucially on the topology of the underlying transmission network. This paper provides an analytical upper bound of the efficiency loss due to strategic suppliers, and proves that the bound is tight under a large class of transmission networks (i.e., weakly cyclic networks). Our upper bound sheds light on how the efficiency loss depends on the transmission network topology (e.g., the degrees of nodes, the admittances and flow limits of transmission lines).

Explore related subjects

cs.GTcs.MA

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

YuanzhangXiao, ChaithanyaBandi, Ermin Wei. 2023-08-22. Supply Function Equilibrium in Networked Electricity Markets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11420

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗