Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2308.15714

A Global Analysis of the Primal-Dual Method for Pliable Families

Ishan Bansal
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study a core algorithmic problem in network design called ${F}$-augmentation that involves increasing the connectivity of a given family of cuts ${F}$. Over 30 years ago, Williamson et al. (STOC `93) provided a 2-approximation primal-dual algorithm when ${F}$ is a so-called uncrossable family but extending their results to families that are non-uncrossable has remained a challenging question. In this paper, we introduce the novel concept of the crossing density of a set family and show how this opens up a completely new approach to analyzing primal-dual algorithms. We study pliable families, a strict generalization of uncrossable families introduced by Bansal et al. (ICALP `23), and provide the first approximation algorithm for ${F}$-augmentation of general pliable families. We also improve on the results in Bansal et al. (ICALP `23) by providing a 6-approximation algorithm for the ${F}$-augmentation problem when ${F}$ is a family of near min-cuts. This immediately improves approximation factors for the Capacitated Network Design Problem. Finally, we study the $(p,3)$-flexible graph connectivity problem. By carefully analyzing the structure of feasible solutions and using the techniques developed in this paper, we provide the first constant factor approximation algorithm for this problem exhibiting an 12-approximation algorithm.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ishan Bansal. 2023-08-30. A Global Analysis of the Primal-Dual Method for Pliable Families. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15714

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗