SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2309.00790

PFL-LSTR: A privacy-preserving framework for driver intention inference based on in-vehicle and out-vehicle information

Abstract

Intelligent vehicle anticipation of the movement intentions of other drivers can reduce collisions. Typically, when a human driver of another vehicle (referred to as the target vehicle) engages in specific behaviors such as checking the rearview mirror prior to lane change, a valuable clue is therein provided on the intentions of the target vehicle's driver. Furthermore, the target driver's intentions can be influenced and shaped by their driving environment. For example, if the target vehicle is too close to a leading vehicle, it may renege the lane change decision. On the other hand, a following vehicle in the target lane is too close to the target vehicle could lead to its reversal of the decision to change lanes. Knowledge of such intentions of all vehicles in a traffic stream can help enhance traffic safety. Unfortunately, such information is often captured in the form of images/videos. Utilization of personally identifiable data to train a general model could violate user privacy. Federated Learning (FL) is a promising tool to resolve this conundrum. FL efficiently trains models without exposing the underlying data. This paper introduces a Personalized Federated Learning (PFL) model embedded a long short-term transformer (LSTR) framework. The framework predicts drivers' intentions by leveraging in-vehicle videos (of driver movement, gestures, and expressions) and out-of-vehicle videos (of the vehicle's surroundings - frontal/rear areas). The proposed PFL-LSTR framework is trained and tested through real-world driving data collected from human drivers at Interstate 65 in Indiana. The results suggest that the PFL-LSTR exhibits high adaptability and high precision, and that out-of-vehicle information (particularly, the driver's rear-mirror viewing actions) is important because it helps reduce false positives and thereby enhances the precision of driver intention inference.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Runjia Du, Pei Li, Sikai Chen, Samuel Labi. 2023-09-02. PFL-LSTR: A privacy-preserving framework for driver intention inference based on in-vehicle and out-vehicle information. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.00790

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO