SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2309.01136

$(\min,+)$ Matrix and Vector Products for Inputs Decomposable into Few Monotone Subsequences

Abstract

We study the time complexity of computing the $(\min,+)$ matrix product of two $n\times n$ integer matrices in terms of $n$ and the number of monotone subsequences the rows of the first matrix and the columns of the second matrix can be decomposed into. In particular, we show that if each row of the first matrix can be decomposed into at most $m_1$ monotone subsequences and each column of the second matrix can be decomposed into at most $m_2$ monotone subsequences such that all the subsequences are non-decreasing or all of them are non-increasing then the $(\min,+)$ product of the matrices can be computed in $O(m_1m_2n^{2.569})$ time. On the other hand, we observe that if all the rows of the first matrix are non-decreasing and all columns of the second matrix are non-increasing or {\em vice versa} then this case is as hard as the general one. Similarly, we also study the time complexity of computing the $(\min,+)$ convolution of two $n$-dimensional integer vectors in terms of $n$ and the number of monotone subsequences the two vectors can be decomposed into. We show that if the first vector can be decomposed into at most $m_1$ monotone subsequences and the second vector can be decomposed into at most $m_2$ subsequences such that all the subsequences of the first vector are non-decreasing and all the subsequences of the second vector are non-increasing or {\em vice versa} then their $(\min,+)$ convolution can be computed in $\tilde{O}(m_1m_2n^{1.5})$ time. On the other, the case when both vectors are non-decreasing or both of them are non-increasing is as hard as the general case.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Andrzej Lingas, Mia Persson. 2023-09-03. $(\min,+)$ Matrix and Vector Products for Inputs Decomposable into Few Monotone Subsequences. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01136

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS