Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2309.05133

Parallel RAM from Cyclic Circuits

David Heath
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Known simulations of random access machines (RAMs) or parallel RAMs (PRAMs) by Boolean circuits incur significant polynomial blowup, due to the need to repeatedly simulate accesses to a large main memory. Consider a single modification to Boolean circuits that removes the restriction that circuit graphs are acyclic. We call this the cyclic circuit model. Note, cyclic circuits remain combinational, as they do not allow wire values to change over time. We simulate PRAM with a cyclic circuit, and the blowup from our simulation is only polylogarithmic. Consider a PRAM program $P$ that on a length-$n$ input uses an arbitrary number of processors to manipulate words of size $\Theta(\log n)$ bits and then halts within $W(n)$ work. We construct a size-$O(W(n)\cdot \log^4 n)$ cyclic circuit that simulates $P$. Suppose that on a particular input, $P$ halts in time $T$; our circuit computes the same output within $T \cdot O(\log^3 n)$ gate delay. This implies theoretical feasibility of powerful parallel machines. Cyclic circuits can be implemented in hardware, and our circuit achieves performance within polylog factors of PRAM. Our simulated PRAM synchronizes processors via logical dependencies between wires.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

David Heath. 2023-09-10. Parallel RAM from Cyclic Circuits. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05133

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗