SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2309.06523

Directed Sets of Topology -- Tukey Representation and Rejection

Abstract

Every directed set is Tukey equivalent to (a) the family of all compact subsets, ordered by inclusion, of a (locally compact) space, to (b) a neighborhood filter, ordered by reverse inclusion, of a point (of a compact space, and of a topological group), and to (c) the universal uniformity, ordered by reverse inclusion, of a space. Two directed sets are Tukey equivalent if they are cofinally equivalent in the sense that they can both be order embedded cofinally in a third directed set. In contrast, any totally bounded uniformity is Tukey equivalent to $[\kappa]^{<\omega}$, the collection of all finite subsets of $\kappa$, where $\kappa$ is the cofinality of the uniformity. All other Tukey types are `rejected' by totally bounded uniformities. Equivalently, a compact space $X$ has weight (minimal size of a base) equal to $\kappa$ if and only if the neighborhood filter of the diagonal is Tukey equivalent to $[\kappa]^{<\omega}$. A number of questions from the literature are answered with the aid of the above results.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ziqin Feng, Paul Gartside. 2023-09-12. Directed Sets of Topology -- Tukey Representation and Rejection. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06523

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN