SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2309.07553

Identifying Job Satisfaction Parameters among the Employees in Higher Educational Institutions: A Mathematical Model

Abstract

The study is conducted to evaluate the job satisfaction among the administrative and teaching faculties in higher educational institutions. Many researchers have conducted studies to evaluate differences in job perception between teaching and non-teaching staff. Despite this, none of the studies have explicitly focused on developing a formal mathematical approach for analysis. Thus, this paper aims to identify the job satisfaction parameters among staff in an educational institution by using Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) tools. The factors influencing employee job satisfaction have been ascertained and hierarchically organized through the utilization of the standard deviation methodology. Analytical findings reveal that certain variables, including promotional opportunities, interpersonal relations with colleagues, managerial support, and the department of employment, exert a substantial impact on an individual's level of job satisfaction. The research posits that the strategic implementation of these variables and attributes by organizational management can significantly ameliorate challenges related to employee retention, thereby enhancing overall workforce efficiency.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mahak Bhatia, Aled Williams. 2023-09-14. Identifying Job Satisfaction Parameters among the Employees in Higher Educational Institutions: A Mathematical Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07553

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO