Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2309.14540

Effect of roundabout design on the behavior of road users: A case study of roundabouts with application of Unsupervised Machine Learning

Tasnim M. Dwekat·Ayda A. Almsre·Huthaifa I. Ashqar
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the performance of the rotors and study the behavior of the human driver in interacting with the rotors. In recent years, rotors have been increasingly used between countries due to their safety, capacity, and environmental advantages, and because they provide safe and fluid flows of vehicles for transit and integration. It turns out that roundabouts can significantly reduce speed at twisting intersections, entry speed and the resulting effect on speed depends on the rating of road users. In our research, (bus, car, truck) drivers were given special attention and their behavior was categorized into (conservative, normal, aggressive). Anticipating and recognizing driver behavior is an important challenge. Therefore, the aim of this research is to study the effect of roundabouts on these classifiers and to develop a method for predicting the behavior of road users at roundabout intersections. Safety is primarily due to two inherent features of the rotor. First, by comparing the data collected and processed in order to classify and evaluate drivers' behavior, and comparing the speeds of the drivers (bus, car and truck), the speed of motorists at crossing the roundabout was more fit than that of buses and trucks. We looked because the car is smaller and all parts of the rotor are visible to it. So drivers coming from all directions have to slow down, giving them more time to react and mitigating the consequences in the event of an accident. Second, with fewer conflicting flows (and points of conflict), drivers only need to look to their left (in right-hand traffic) for other vehicles, making their job of crossing the roundabout easier as there is less need to split attention between different directions.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.AIcs.CVcs.CY

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tasnim M. Dwekat, Ayda A. Almsre, Huthaifa I. Ashqar. 2023-09-25. Effect of roundabout design on the behavior of road users: A case study of roundabouts with application of Unsupervised Machine Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.14540

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗