SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2310.05761

Robust Minimum Distance Inference in Structural Models

Abstract

This paper proposes minimum distance inference for a structural parameter of interest, which is robust to the lack of identification of other structural nuisance parameters. Some choices of the weighting matrix lead to asymptotic chi-squared distributions with degrees of freedom that can be consistently estimated from the data, even under partial identification. In any case, knowledge of the level of under-identification is not required. We study the power of our robust test. Several examples show the wide applicability of the procedure and a Monte Carlo investigates its finite sample performance. Our identification-robust inference method can be applied to make inferences on both calibrated (fixed) parameters and any other structural parameter of interest. We illustrate the method's usefulness by applying it to a structural model on the non-neutrality of monetary policy, as in \cite{nakamura2018high}, where we empirically evaluate the validity of the calibrated parameters and we carry out robust inference on the slope of the Phillips curve and the information effect.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Joan Alegre, Juan Carlos Escanciano. 2023-10-09. Robust Minimum Distance Inference in Structural Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.05761

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM