SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2310.06130

Statistical inference for radial generalized Pareto distributions and return sets in geometric extremes

Abstract

We use a functional analogue of the quantile function for probability measures on $\mathbb{R}^d$ to characterize a novel limit Poisson point process for radially recentred and rescaled random vectors under a radial-directional decomposition. This limit process yields new multivariate distributions, including \textit{radial generalised Pareto distributions}, exhibiting stability for extrapolation to extremal sets along any direction. We show that the normalising functions leading to the limit Poisson point process correspond to a novel class of sets visited with fixed probability, with geometric properties determined by the conditional distribution of the radius given the direction and the Radon-Nikodym derivative of the directional probability distribution relative to reference spherical measures. This leads to return sets, defined by the complement of these probability sets and expressed by their return period. We identify an important member, the \textit{isotropic return set}, where all directions of exceedances outside the set are equally likely. Building on the limit Poisson point process likelihood, we develop parsimonious statistical models leveraging links between limit distribution parameters, with novel diagnostics for assessing convergence to the limiting distribution. These models enable Bayesian inference for return sets with arbitrarily large return periods and probabilities of unobserved extreme events, incorporating directional information from observations outside probability sets. The framework supports efficient computations in dimensions d=2 and d=3. We demonstrate the utility of the methods through simulations and case studies involving hydrological and oceanographic data, showcasing potential for robust and interpretable analysis of multivariate extremes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ioannis Papastathopoulos, Lambert de Monte, Ryan Campbell, Haavard Rue. 2023-10-09. Statistical inference for radial generalized Pareto distributions and return sets in geometric extremes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06130

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME