Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2310.12096

Vital Edges for (s,t)-mincut: Efficient Algorithms, Compact Structures, and Optimal Sensitivity Oracle

Surender Baswana·Koustav Bhanja
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Let G be a directed weighted graph (DiGraph) on n vertices and m edges with source s and sink t. An edge in G is vital if its removal reduces the capacity of (s,t)-mincut. Since the seminal work of Ford and Fulkerson, a long line of work has been done on computing the most vital edge and all vital edges of G. Unfortunately, after 60 years, the existing results are for undirected or unweighted graphs. We present the following result for DiGraph, which solves an open problem stated by Ausiello et al. 1. There is an algorithm that computes all vital edges as well as the most vital edge of G using O(n) maxflow computations. Vital edges play a crucial role in the design of Sensitivity Oracle (SO) for (s,t)-mincut. For directed graphs, the only existing SO is for unweighted graphs by Picard and Queyranne. We present the first and optimal SO for DiGraph. 2. (a) There is an O(n) space SO that can report in O(1) time the capacity of (s,t)-mincut and (b) an O($n^2$) space SO that can report an (s,t)-mincut in O(n) time after failure/insertion of an edge. For unweighted graphs, Picard and Queyranne designed an O(m) space DAG that stores and characterizes all mincuts for all vital edges. Conversely, there is a set containing at most n-1 (s,t)-cuts such that at least one mincut for every vital edge belongs to the set. We generalize these results for DiGraph. 3. (a) There is a set containing at most n-1 (s,t)-cuts such that at least one mincut for every vital edge is present in the set. (b) We design two compact structures for storing and characterizing all mincuts for all vital edges, (i) O(m) space DAG for partial characterization and (ii) O(mn) space structure for complete characterization. To arrive at our results, we develop new techniques, especially a generalization of maxflow-mincut theorem by Ford and Fulkerson, which might be of independent interest.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Surender Baswana, Koustav Bhanja. 2023-10-18. Vital Edges for (s,t)-mincut: Efficient Algorithms, Compact Structures, and Optimal Sensitivity Oracle. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12096

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗