SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2310.17213

\'Evaluation entre pairs en math\'ematiques: activit\'e d'\'etudiant$\bullet$es lors d'\'evaluations de preuves

Abstract

This article deals with peer-assessment in the context of higher education teaching in mathematics, and examines the nature of student activity when assessing work produced by peers. After an overview of research on peer assessment, we propose an experiment with students in a specific post-secondary scientific class, and analyze the activity of the students involved. Our analyses are based on a priori analyses of the proposed tasks and tools from research on students personal mathematical work. We base on written notes of assessments, observations of pairs in assessment situations, and answers to a questionnaire on the perception of their activity. We have identified some specific student activities during the peer assessment process, in particular related to the analysis and correction of proofs, but also to the awareness of the issues associated with evaluation. This enables us to argue for the potential of peer assessment in higher mathematics education.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Juliette Veuillez--Mainard, Simon Modeste. 2023-10-26. \'Evaluation entre pairs en math\'ematiques: activit\'e d'\'etudiant$\bullet$es lors d'\'evaluations de preuves. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17213

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO