SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2311.01630

Generalizations of Matrix Multiplication can solve the Light Bulb Problem

Abstract

In the light bulb problem, one is given uniformly random vectors $x_1, \ldots, x_n, y_1, \ldots, y_n \in \{-1,1\}^d$. They are all chosen independently except a planted pair $(x_{i^*}, y_{j^*})$ is chosen with correlation $\rho>0$. The goal is to find the planted pair. This problem was introduced over 30 years ago by L.~Valiant, and is known to have many applications in data analysis, statistics, and learning theory. The naive algorithm runs in $\Omega(n^2)$ time, and algorithms based on Locality-Sensitive Hashing approach quadratic time as $\rho \to 0$. In 2012, G.~Valiant gave a breakthrough algorithm using fast matrix multiplication that runs in time $O(n^{(5-\omega)/(4-\omega)}) < O(n^{1.615})$, no matter how small $\rho>0$ is. This was subsequently refined by Karppa, Kaski, and Kohonen in 2016 to $O(n^{2 \omega / 3}) < O(n^{1.582})$. In this paper, we propose a new approach which can replace matrix multiplication tensor with other tensors. Those tensors can omit some terms one is supposed to compute, and include additional error terms. Our new approach can make use of any tensors which previously had no known algorithmic applications, including tensors which arise naturally as intermediate steps in border rank methods and in the Laser method. We further show that our approach can be combined with locality-sensitive hashing to design an algorithm whose running time improves as $\rho$ gets larger. To our knowledge, this is the first algorithm which combines fast matrix multiplication with hashing for the light bulb problem or any closest pair problem, and it leads to faster algorithms for small $\rho>0$. We also introduce a new tensor $T_{2112}$, which has the same size of $2 \times 2$ matrix multiplication tensor, but runs faster than the Strassen's algorithm for light bulb problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Josh Alman, Hengjie Zhang. 2023-11-02. Generalizations of Matrix Multiplication can solve the Light Bulb Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01630

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS