Semantic Modelling of Organizational Knowledge as a Basis for Enterprise Data Governance 4.0 -- Application to a Unified Clinical Data Model

Miguel AP Oliveira; Stephane Manara; Bruno Molé; Thomas Muller; Aurélien Guillouche; Lysann Hesske; Bruce Jordan; Gilles Hubert; Chinmay Kulkarni; Pralipta Jagdev; Cedric R. Berger

arXiv · 2311.02082

Semantic Modelling of Organizational Knowledge as a Basis for Enterprise Data Governance 4.0 -- Application to a Unified Clinical Data Model

Miguel AP Oliveira·Stephane Manara·Bruno Molé·Thomas Muller·Aurélien Guillouche·Lysann Hesske·Bruce Jordan·Gilles Hubert·Chinmay Kulkarni·Pralipta Jagdev·Cedric R. Berger

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Individuals and organizations cope with an always-growing amount of data, which is heterogeneous in its contents and formats. An adequate data management process yielding data quality and control over its lifecycle is a prerequisite to getting value out of this data and minimizing inherent risks related to multiple usages. Common data governance frameworks rely on people, policies, and processes that fall short of the overwhelming complexity of data. Yet, harnessing this complexity is necessary to achieve high-quality standards. The latter will condition any downstream data usage outcome, including generative artificial intelligence trained on this data. In this paper, we report our concrete experience establishing a simple, cost-efficient framework that enables metadata-driven, agile and (semi-)automated data governance (i.e. Data Governance 4.0). We explain how we implement and use this framework to integrate 25 years of clinical study data at an enterprise scale in a fully productive environment. The framework encompasses both methodologies and technologies leveraging semantic web principles. We built a knowledge graph describing avatars of data assets in their business context, including governance principles. Multiple ontologies articulated by an enterprise upper ontology enable key governance actions such as FAIRification, lifecycle management, definition of roles and responsibilities, lineage across transformations and provenance from source systems. This metadata model is the keystone to data governance 4.0: a semi-automatised data management process that considers the business context in an agile manner to adapt governance constraints to each use case and dynamically tune it based on business changes.

Explore related subjects

cs.AI cs.IR

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Miguel AP Oliveira, Stephane Manara, Bruno Molé, Thomas Muller, Aurélien Guillouche, Lysann Hesske, Bruce Jordan, Gilles Hubert, Chinmay Kulkarni, Pralipta Jagdev, Cedric R. Berger. 2023-10-20. Semantic Modelling of Organizational Knowledge as a Basis for Enterprise Data Governance 4.0 -- Application to a Unified Clinical Data Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.02082

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗