SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2311.03592

Sketching methods with small window guarantee using minimum decycling sets

Abstract

Most sequence sketching methods work by selecting specific $k$-mers from sequences so that the similarity between two sequences can be estimated using only the sketches. Estimating sequence similarity is much faster using sketches than using sequence alignment, hence sketching methods are used to reduce the computational requirements of computational biology software packages. Applications using sketches often rely on properties of the $k$-mer selection procedure to ensure that using a sketch does not degrade the quality of the results compared with using sequence alignment. In particular the window guarantee ensures that no long region of the sequence goes unrepresented in the sketch. A sketching method with a window guarantee corresponds to a Decycling Set, aka an unavoidable sets of $k$-mers. Any long enough sequence must contain a $k$-mer from any decycling set (hence, it is unavoidable). Conversely, a decycling set defines a sketching method by selecting the $k$-mers from the set. Although current methods use one of a small number of sketching method families, the space of decycling sets is much larger, and largely unexplored. Finding decycling sets with desirable characteristics is a promising approach to discovering new sketching methods with improved performance (e.g., with small window guarantee). The Minimum Decycling Sets (MDSs) are of particular interest because of their small size. Only two algorithms, by Mykkeltveit and Champarnaud, are known to generate two particular MDSs, although there is a vast number of alternative MDSs. We provide a simple method that allows one to explore the space of MDSs and to find sets optimized for desirable properties. We give evidence that the Mykkeltveit sets are close to optimal regarding one particular property, the remaining path length.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Guillaume Marçais, Dan DeBlasio, Carl Kingsford. 2023-11-06. Sketching methods with small window guarantee using minimum decycling sets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.03592

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS