SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2311.04533

Improved Approximations for Ultrametric Violation Distance

Abstract

We study the Ultrametric Violation Distance problem introduced by Cohen-Addad, Fan, Lee, and Mesmay [FOCS, 2022]. Given pairwise distances $x\in \mathbb{R}_{>0}^{\binom{[n]}{2}}$ as input, the goal is to modify the minimum number of distances so as to make it a valid ultrametric. In other words, this is the problem of fitting an ultrametric to given data, where the quality of the fit is measured by the $\ell_0$ norm of the error; variants of the problem for the $\ell_\infty$ and $\ell_1$ norms are well-studied in the literature. Our main result is a 5-approximation algorithm for Ultrametric Violation Distance, improving the previous best large constant factor ($\geq 1000$) approximation algorithm. We give an $O(\min\{L,\log n\})$-approximation for weighted Ultrametric Violation Distance where the weights satisfy triangle inequality and $L$ is the number of distinct values in the input. We also give a $16$-approximation for the problem on $k$-partite graphs, where the input is specified on pairs of vertices that form a complete $k$-partite graph. All our results use a unified algorithmic framework with small modifications for the three cases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Moses Charikar, Ruiquan Gao. 2023-11-08. Improved Approximations for Ultrametric Violation Distance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04533

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS