SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2311.04865

Computing the $5$-Edge-Connected Components in Linear Time

Abstract

We provide a deterministic algorithm for computing the $5$-edge-connected components of an undirected multigraph in linear time. There were probably good indications that this computation can be performed in linear time, but no such algorithm was actually known prior to this work. Thus, our paper answers a theoretical question, and sheds light on the possibility that a solution may exist for general $k$. A key component in our algorithm is an oracle for answering connectivity queries for pairs of vertices in the presence of at most four edge-failures. Specifically, the oracle has size $O(n)$, it can be constructed in linear time, and it answers connectivity queries in the presence of at most four edge-failures in worst-case constant time, where $n$ denotes the number of vertices of the graph. We note that this is a result of independent interest. Our paper can be considered as a follow-up of recent work on computing the $4$-edge-connected components in linear time. However, in dealing with the computation of the $5$-edge-connected components, we are faced with unique challenges that do not appear when dealing with lower connectivity. The problem is that the $4$-edge cuts in $3$-edge-connected graphs are entangled in various complicated ways, that make it difficult to organize them in a compact way. Here we provide a novel analysis of those cuts, that reveals the existence of various interesting structures. These can be exploited so that we can disentangle and collect only those cuts that are essential in computing the $5$-edge-connected components. This analysis may provide a clue for a general solution for the $k$-edge-connected components, or other related graph connectivity problems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Evangelos Kosinas. 2023-11-08. Computing the $5$-Edge-Connected Components in Linear Time. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04865

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS