SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2311.07540

Finding planted cliques using gradient descent

Abstract

The planted clique problem is a paradigmatic model of statistical-to-computational gaps: the planted clique is information-theoretically detectable if its size $k\ge 2\log_2 n$ but polynomial-time algorithms only exist for the recovery task when $k= \Omega(\sqrt{n})$. By now, there are many algorithms that succeed as soon as $k = \Omega(\sqrt{n})$. Glaringly, however, no black-box optimization method, e.g., gradient descent or the Metropolis process, has been shown to work. In fact, Chen, Mossel, and Zadik recently showed that any Metropolis process whose state space is the set of cliques fails to find any sub-linear sized planted clique in polynomial time if initialized naturally from the empty set. We show that using the method of Lagrange multipliers, namely optimizing the Hamiltonian given by the sum of the objective function and the clique constraint over the space of all subgraphs, succeeds. In particular, we prove that Markov chains which minimize this Hamiltonian (gradient descent and a low-temperature relaxation of it) succeed at recovering planted cliques of size $k = \Omega(\sqrt{n})$ if initialized from the full graph. Importantly, initialized from the empty set, the relaxation still does not help the gradient descent find sub-linear planted cliques. We also demonstrate robustness of these Markov chain approaches under a natural contamination model.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Reza Gheissari, Aukosh Jagannath, Yiming Xu. 2023-11-13. Finding planted cliques using gradient descent. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.07540

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS