arXiv · 2311.08256
Consensus and Disagreement: Information Aggregation under (not so) Naive Learning
Abstract
We explore a model of non-Bayesian information aggregation in networks. Agents non-cooperatively choose among Friedkin-Johnsen type aggregation rules to maximize payoffs. The DeGroot rule is chosen in equilibrium if and only if there is noiseless information transmission, leading to consensus. With noisy transmission, while some disagreement is inevitable, the optimal choice of rule amplifies the disagreement: even with little noise, individuals place substantial weight on their own initial opinion in every period, exacerbating the disagreement. We use this framework to think about equilibrium versus socially efficient choice of rules and its connection to polarization of opinions across groups.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Abhijit Banerjee, Olivier Compte. 2023-11-14. Consensus and Disagreement: Information Aggregation under (not so) Naive Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08256
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.