SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2311.10616

Sparsity-Parameterised Dynamic Edge Colouring

Abstract

We study the edge-colouring problem, and give efficient algorithms where the number of colours is parameterised by the graph's arboricity, $\alpha$. In a dynamic graph, subject to insertions and deletions, we give a deterministic algorithm that updates a proper $\Delta + O(\alpha)$ edge~colouring in $\operatorname{poly}(\log n)$ amortized time. Our algorithm is fully adaptive to the current value of the maximum degree and arboricity. In this fully-dynamic setting, the state-of-the-art edge-colouring algorithms are either a randomised algorithm using $(1 + \varepsilon)\Delta$ colours in $\operatorname{poly}(\log n, \epsilon^{-1})$ time per update, or the naive greedy algorithm which is a deterministic $2\Delta -1$ edge colouring with $\log(\Delta)$ update time. Compared to the $(1+\varepsilon)\Delta$ algorithm, our algorithm is deterministic and asymptotically faster, and when $\alpha$ is sufficiently small compared to $\Delta$, it even uses fewer colours. In particular, ours is the first $\Delta+O(1)$ edge-colouring algorithm for dynamic forests, and dynamic planar graphs, with polylogarithmic update time. Additionally, in the static setting, we show that we can find a proper edge colouring with $\Delta + 2\alpha$ colours in $O(m\log n)$ time. Moreover, the colouring returned by our algorithm has the following local property: every edge $uv$ is coloured with a colour in $\{1, \max\{deg(u), deg(v)\} + 2\alpha\}$. The time bound matches that of the greedy algorithm that computes a $2\Delta-1$ colouring of the graph's edges, and improves the number of colours when $\alpha$ is sufficiently small compared to $\Delta$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aleksander B. G. Christiansen, Eva Rotenberg, Juliette Vlieghe. 2023-11-17. Sparsity-Parameterised Dynamic Edge Colouring. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10616

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS