SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2311.13590

Triangle-free 2-matchings

Abstract

We consider the problem of finding a maximum size triangle-free $2$-matching in a graph $G=(V,E)$. A (simple) $2$-matching is any subset of the edges such that each vertex is incident to at most two edges from the subset. The first polynomial time algorithm for this problem was given by Hartvigsen in 1984 in his PhD thesis and its improved version has been recently published in a journal. We present a different, significantly simpler algorithm with a relatively short proof of correctness. Our algorithm with running time $O(|V||E|)$ is additionally faster than the one by Hartvigsen having running time $O(|V|^3|E|^2)$. It has been proven before that for any triangle-free $2$-matching $M$ which is not maximum the graph contains an $M$-augmenting path, whose application to $M$ results in a bigger triangle-free $2$-matching. A new observation is that the search for an augmenting path $P$ can be restricted to so-called {\em amenable} paths that go through any triangle $t$ contained in $P\cup M$ a limited number of times. Amenable paths can be characterised with the aid of {\em half-edges}. A {\em half-edge} of edge $e$ is, informally speaking, a half of $e$ containing exactly one of its endpoints. Each half-edge serves also as a {\em hinge} - a connector between one pair of edges on an alternating path. To find an amenable augmenting path we thus dynamically remove and re-add half-edges to forbid or allow some edges to be followed by certain others. The existence of amenable augmenting paths follows from our decomposition theorem for triangle-free $2$-matchings. This decomposition theorem is largely the same as the decomposition from versions 1-6 of this paper and is moreover simpler and stronger than the one given by Kobayashi and Noguchi.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Katarzyna Paluch. 2023-11-22. Triangle-free 2-matchings. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.13590

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS