SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2311.13673

On the Size Overhead of Pairwise Spanners

Abstract

Given an undirected possibly weighted $n$-vertex graph $G=(V,E)$ and a set $\mathcal{P}\subseteq V^2$ of pairs, a subgraph $S=(V,E')$ is called a ${\cal P}$-pairwise $\alpha$-spanner of $G$, if for every pair $(u,v)\in\mathcal{P}$ we have $d_S(u,v)\leq\alpha\cdot d_G(u,v)$. The parameter $\alpha$ is called the stretch of the spanner, and its size overhead is define as $\frac{|E'|}{|{\cal P}|}$. A surprising connection was recently discussed between the additive stretch of $(1+\epsilon,\beta)$-spanners, to the hopbound of $(1+\epsilon,\beta)$-hopsets. A long sequence of works showed that if the spanner/hopset has size $\approx n^{1+1/k}$ for some parameter $k\ge 1$, then $\beta\approx\left(\frac1\epsilon\right)^{\log k}$. In this paper we establish a new connection to the size overhead of pairwise spanners. In particular, we show that if $|{\cal P}|\approx n^{1+1/k}$, then a ${\cal P}$-pairwise $(1+\epsilon)$-spanner must have size at least $\beta\cdot |{\cal P}|$ with $\beta\approx\left(\frac1\epsilon\right)^{\log k}$ (a near matching upper bound was recently shown in \cite{ES23}). We also extend the connection between pairwise spanners and hopsets to the large stretch regime, by showing nearly matching upper and lower bounds for ${\cal P}$-pairwise $\alpha$-spanners. In particular, we show that if $|{\cal P}|\approx n^{1+1/k}$, then the size overhead is $\beta\approx\frac k\alpha$. A source-wise spanner is a special type of pairwise spanner, for which ${\cal P}=A\times V$ for some $A\subseteq V$. A prioritized spanner is given also a ranking of the vertices $V=(v_1,\dots,v_n)$, and is required to provide improved stretch for pairs containing higher ranked vertices. By using a sequence of reductions, we improve on the state-of-the-art results for source-wise and prioritized spanners.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ofer Neiman, Idan Shabat. 2023-11-22. On the Size Overhead of Pairwise Spanners. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.13673

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS