SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2312.00213

Notes on Bolyai's 'Appendix'

Abstract

This paper aims to provide an explanatory edition of Bolyai's 'Appendix Demonstrating the Absolute Science of Space', first published in 1832. In this treatise Bolyai began by extending neutral (or 'absolute') geometry by deriving a number of theorems which are independent of Euclid's parallel postulate. Then, while retaining Euclid first four postulates, he explored the consequences of replacing the parallel postulate with a different assumption, that through a given point not on a given straight line, more than than one straight line can be drawn which does not intersect the given line. On this basis Bolyai developed a non-Euclidean geometry nowadays called hyperbolic geometry. The English translation of Bolyai's text is reprinted in the paper, with explanatory notes provided at the end of each section. Some of the theorems are discussed in detail, with a particular focus on those in which Bolyai derived the trigonometric identities of the hyperbolic plane and on his astonishing quadrature of the circle. Bolyai's terse style of exposition can be quite challenging, so I have tried to fill in some of the mathematical details which he chose to omit, either through lack of space or simply because he thought them to obvious too include.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Steven Rose. 2023-07-22. Notes on Bolyai's 'Appendix'. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00213

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO