SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2312.02288

Almost Dominance: Inference and Application

Abstract

This paper proposes a general framework for inference on three types of almost dominances: almost Lorenz dominance, almost inverse stochastic dominance, and almost stochastic dominance. We first generalize almost Lorenz dominance to almost upward and downward Lorenz dominances. We then provide a bootstrap inference procedure for the Lorenz dominance coefficients, which measure the degrees of almost Lorenz dominance. Furthermore, we propose almost upward and downward inverse stochastic dominances and provide inference on the inverse stochastic dominance coefficients. We also show that our results can easily be extended to almost stochastic dominance. Simulation studies demonstrate the finite sample properties of the proposed estimators and the bootstrap confidence intervals. This framework can be applied to economic analysis, particularly in the areas of social welfare, inequality, and decision making under uncertainty. As an empirical example, we apply the methods to the inequality growth in the United Kingdom and find evidence for almost upward inverse stochastic dominance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Xiaojun Song, Zhenting Sun. 2023-12-04. Almost Dominance: Inference and Application. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02288

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM