Distances and shortest paths on graphs of bounded highway dimension: simple, fast, dynamic

Sébastien Collette; John Iacono

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2312.04235

Distances and shortest paths on graphs of bounded highway dimension: simple, fast, dynamic

Sébastien Collette·John Iacono

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Dijkstra's algorithm is the standard method for computing shortest paths on arbitrary graphs. However, it is slow for large graphs, taking at least linear time. It has been long known that for real world road networks, creating a hierarchy of well-chosen shortcuts allows fast distance and path computation, with exact distance queries seemingly being answered in logarithmic time. However, these methods were but heuristics until the work of Abraham et al.~[JACM 2016], where they defined a graph parameter called highway dimension which is constant for real-world road networks, and showed that in graphs of constant highway dimension, a shortcut hierarchy exists that guarantees shortest distance computation takes $O(\log (U+V))$ time and $O(V \log (U+V))$ space, where $U$ is the ratio of the smallest to largest edge, and $V$ is the number of vertices. The problem is that they were unable to efficiently compute the hierarchy of shortcuts. Here we present a simple and efficient algorithm to compute the needed hierarchy of shortcuts in time and space $O(V \log (U+V))$, as well as supporting updates in time $O( \log (U+V))$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Sébastien Collette, John Iacono. 2023-12-07. Distances and shortest paths on graphs of bounded highway dimension: simple, fast, dynamic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04235

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗