Approximating APS under Submodular and XOS valuations with Binary Marginals

Pooja Kulkarni; Rucha Kulkarni; Ruta Mehta

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2312.08509

Approximating APS under Submodular and XOS valuations with Binary Marginals

Pooja Kulkarni·Rucha Kulkarni·Ruta Mehta

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the problem of fairly dividing indivisible goods among a set of agents under the fairness notion of Any Price Share (APS). APS is known to dominate the widely studied Maximin share (MMS). Since an exact APS allocation may not exist, the focus has traditionally been on the computation of approximate APS allocations. Babaioff et al. studied the problem under additive valuations, and asked (i) how large can the APS value be compared to the MMS value? and (ii) what guarantees can one achieve beyond additive functions. We partly answer these questions by considering valuations beyond additive, namely submodular and XOS functions, with binary marginals. For the submodular functions with binary marginals, also known as matroid rank functions (MRFs), we show that APS is exactly equal to MMS. Consequently, we get that an exact APS allocation exists and can be computed efficiently while maximizing the social welfare. Complementing this result, we show that it is NP-hard to compute the APS value within a factor of 5/6 for submodular valuations with three distinct marginals of {0, 1/2, 1}. We then consider binary XOS functions, which are immediate generalizations of binary submodular functions in the complement free hierarchy. In contrast to the MRFs setting, MMS and APS values are not equal under this case. Nevertheless, we show that under binary XOS valuations, $MMS \leq APS \leq 2 \cdot MMS + 1$. Further, we show that this is almost the tightest bound we can get using MMS, by giving an instance where $APS \geq 2 \cdot MMS$. The upper bound on APS, implies a ~0.1222-approximation for APS under binary XOS valuations. And the lower bound implies the non-existence of better than 0.5-APS even when agents have identical valuations, which is in sharp contrast to the guaranteed existence of exact MMS allocation when agent valuations are identical.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Pooja Kulkarni, Rucha Kulkarni, Ruta Mehta. 2023-12-13. Approximating APS under Submodular and XOS valuations with Binary Marginals. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.08509

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗