SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2312.10618

Sparse Learning and Class Probability Estimation with Weighted Support Vector Machines

Abstract

Classification and probability estimation are fundamental tasks with broad applications across modern machine learning and data science, spanning fields such as biology, medicine, engineering, and computer science. Recent development of weighted Support Vector Machines (wSVMs) has demonstrated considerable promise in robustly and accurately predicting class probabilities and performing classification across a variety of problems (Wang et al., 2008). However, the existing framework relies on an $\ell^2$-norm regularized binary wSVMs optimization formulation, which is designed for dense features and exhibits limited performance in the presence of sparse features with redundant noise. Effective sparse learning thus requires prescreening of important variables for each binary wSVM to ensure accurate estimation of pairwise conditional probabilities. In this paper, we propose a novel class of wSVMs frameworks that incorporate automatic variable selection with accurate probability estimation for sparse learning problems. We developed efficient algorithms for variable selection by solving either the $\ell^1$-norm or elastic net regularized wSVMs optimization problems. Class probability is then estimated either via the $\ell^2$-norm regularized wSVMs framework applied to the selected variables, or directly through elastic net regularized wSVMs. The two-step approach offers a strong advantage in simultaneous automatic variable selection and reliable probability estimators with competitive computational efficiency. The elastic net regularized wSVMs achieve superior performance in both variable selection and probability estimation, with the added benefit of variable grouping, at the cost of increases compensation time for high dimensional settings. The proposed wSVMs-based sparse learning methods are broadly applicable and can be naturally extended to $K$-class problems through ensemble learning.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Liyun Zeng, Hao Helen Zhang. 2023-12-17. Sparse Learning and Class Probability Estimation with Weighted Support Vector Machines. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10618

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME